What Cash Flow Advice Can You Legally Offer?
If you give clients any kind of financial guidance, use the free tool below to see what you can say, what may involve legal risk, and when extra licensing or authorisation may be needed.

Get started
Click one button in both sections below to see your answer.
1. Where are you based?
RequiredClick one button below to continue.
2. What type of advice are you wanting to give?
RequiredClick one button below to continue.
Country requirements
Pick a country above to see the usual licence, authorisation, and competence path for that market.
Select your country above to bring the relevant requirements into the tool.
A helpful summary
The tool above gives you the quick answer; this section walks through the same boundary step by step.
What are you advising on?
Are you explaining:
- cash flow forecasts
- payment timing
- shortfalls or surpluses
- working-capital pressure
- scenarios such as late payers, hiring, tax timing, payroll pressure
Cash flow insight / operational advice
Are you saying something like:
- “you may need funding”
- “you should talk to a lender”
- “you should get specialist insurance advice”
- “you may need investment advice”
Often safer if you identify the issue and make a neutral introduction, rather than steering the client to a loan, insurer, or investment product
Are you recommending a regulated financial product such as:
- a specific loan
- a specific lender
- a mortgage or overdraft
- an insurance policy or insurer
- an investment product
- a KiwiSaver / super / pension style product where applicable
Advice on lending, insurance, investments, or pension-style products will likely require extra licensing or authorisation
The short version
Across New Zealand, Australia, and the UK, the same practical rule shows up again and again.
Talking about cash flow, timing, shortfalls, collections, supplier pressure, and scenarios is usually one thing.
Recommending a loan, insurance policy, mortgage, investment, or pension product is another.
That distinction matters because advice on those products is regulated.
What is usually fine
Firms can usually:
- prepare and explain cash flow forecasts
- model scenarios such as late payments, hiring, tax timing, payroll pressure, and cost changes
- identify likely shortfalls or surplus cash
- discuss debtor pressure, creditor timing, stock pressure, and working-capital actions
- suggest practical operational next steps such as improving collections, delaying spend, reviewing drawings, or getting specialist help
This is also the line shown in the uploaded NZ one-pager: cash flow forecasting, reporting, scenario modelling, shortfall analysis, working-capital discussion, and practical next steps usually sit in the safer lane.
The common thread is that you are analysing the business cash position and helping the client decide what operational actions to take.
You are not telling the client which lender, insurance policy, investment, mortgage, or KiwiSaver-style product to choose.
What starts to get risky
Risk increases when someone:
- recommends a specific lender, loan, insurance policy, insurer, broker, mortgage, or investment product
- frames operational insight as if it were licensed financial advice
- uses wording that implies a recommendation rather than analysis
- markets the service in a way that sounds like certainty or guaranteed outcomes
The more your language sounds like “take this loan” or “switch to this insurer”, the closer you move to regulated advice.
The safer pattern is to identify the problem, explain the cash impact, and, if you are not licensed or authorised for that advice, say specialist advice is needed. A neutral introduction is different from telling the client which lender, insurer, or product they should choose.
Real examples
“You will likely run short in 3 weeks if the March debtor book lands late.”
“You should take a business loan from [specific bank].”
“You may need funding if debtor timing does not improve. Talk to a qualified lending specialist.”
“You should switch insurers.”
“Your wages, tax, and creditor timing suggest pressure in late April. You may need to delay drawings.”
Best practice if you want to offer cash flow advisory
- Define the service clearly in the engagement letter, and update it if the scope changes.
- Describe it as forecasting, scenario support, and operational cash insight.
- Avoid wording that sounds like advice on a loan, insurance policy, mortgage, or investment product.
- Document assumptions.
- Check professional indemnity insurance cover with your broker before launch or expansion.
- When a client needs lending, insurance, investment, legal, or tax advice, stop at the diagnosis. You can say specialist advice is needed and make a neutral introduction, but do not steer the client to a specific provider or product unless that sits inside your licence or authorisation scope.
What “refer out” means here
Referring a client to a specialist is not the same as recommending a loan, insurer, mortgage, or investment product. The safer pattern is to explain the issue, say the client may need specialist advice, and, if helpful, offer a neutral introduction.
- Safer: “You may need lending advice. We can introduce you to a lending specialist.”
- Riskier: “Use this lender and take this facility.”
- Use extra care if you are paid for referrals, only use one provider, help choose the final product, or package the referral as part of the advice service. That is where introductions can start to look like regulated advice or create conflict issues.
What this means in practice
An engagement letter is the written scope document between you and the client. There is not one universal public template that fits NZ, Australia, and the UK, but the best-practice approach is simple: say clearly what you will do, what you will not do, and when the client needs someone else.
Include
- the service: cash flow forecasting, scenario modelling, and operational cash insight
- the outputs: forecast updates, scenarios, meeting notes, and action points
- the exclusions: no recommendation on specific loans, lenders, insurance policies, insurers, mortgages, investments, or pension-style products unless separately agreed and appropriately licensed or authorised
- the client responsibilities: timely data, assumptions, and decisions provided by the client
- the limits of the work: forecasts depend on assumptions and actual outcomes will differ
- what happens when the client needs specialist advice: referral or introduction only, unless separately authorised
- fees, billing, review points, complaints process, and what happens if the scope changes
Example scope line
“We provide cash flow forecasting, scenario modelling, and operational cash insights. This engagement does not include advice on specific loans, lenders, insurance policies, insurers, mortgages, investment products, KiwiSaver, super, or pension products unless separately agreed in writing and provided by a person appropriately licensed or authorised.”
Run cash flow advisory
Use Budgee to build forecasts, model scenarios, and guide cash decisions without turning the service into advice on a loan, insurance policy, or investment product.
Disclaimer
This page is general information only. It is not legal, licensing, or insurance advice. Firms should confirm their position with their lawyer, regulator guidance, and insurance broker before launching or expanding a cash flow advisory service.